Unlimited vacations actually increases productivity

Photo by VisualPanic

FastCompany has an interesting article about businesses which have abandoned any vacation policy tracking, or at least given employees the option of how much vacation they want / need, that the reality is that people end up putting more into their work, and if anything, the company needs to watch out for burnout of employees!

Is it any wonder then, that plenty of businesses like Accessibility Partners, IBM, and Netflix have sent their vacation policies packing? The concept unlimited time off hasn’t reduced workplaces to chaotic anarchies. Instead, it’s created more efficiency, at least according to Dharmesh Shah, cofounder and CTO of Hubspot.

Unlimited vacation fosters productivity and loyalty because it favors results over input. “We don’t judge employees based on the number of lines of code they write, but instead on the impact their innovative ideas have on our users,” he says. “If we trust employees to make the right decisions with the time they spend at work in pursuit of our aggressive goals, we can trust them to make responsible decisions about when they choose to take time off of work.”

GoHealthInsurance.com also implemented an unlimited vacation policy, in keeping with the company’s free-spirited culture, which includes a (hopefully tongue in cheek) “no pants and purple hats” dress code, i.e.: no policy at all. With a business model similar to Priceline, the company recorded a 200% increase in growth this year.

Remarkable bosses do these things

This article in Inc gives some tips on being a great boss. Read teh article for the full details, but in summary, here are the points:

  • Develop every employee.
  • Deal with problems immediately.
  • Rescue your worst employee.
  • Serve others, not yourself.
  • Always remember where you came from.

“Don’t worry about reaching performance goals. Spend the bulk of your time developing the skills of your employees and achieving goals will be a natural outcome.”

I’m not crazy, really I’m not crazy

Well maybe a little.

Over the Easter weekend I finally had some time to read one of the books in the pile waiting to be read. On Saturday I started to read “Living with a Creative Mind“, by Jeff and Julie Crabtree, and couldn’t put it down until I had finished it. And then today (Monday) I skimmed through the highlights again (I used a serious amount of yellow fluoro pen marking key phrases or sections the first time through).

The book turned out to be exactly what I needed at this time, putting a lot I have been feeling and thinking about into perspective. It was encouraging to realize that my ideas and feelings are not bad, and that I had to somehow get those straightened out to match others’ expectations.

Jeff Crabtree has been someone I’ve watched with fascination and a big smile because I love the way that what he does and says is unexpected, and I’m sure his t-shirts have messed with the heads of more than one person in his lifetime. Jeff is a musician, and has been principal of an arts college. Jeff’s wife Julie is a psychologist, and has counselled people at the arts college. The book was borne out of the two of them learning about how Jeff ticked, and watching the similarities in experiences in students at the college.

“Living with a Creative Mind” looks at:

  • What is creativity, and the processes involved in creation
  • Typical behaviours and psychology of creatives
  • The nine dimensions of a creative mind: a revealing look at different aspects of how a creative person thinks
  • What are some of the things which inhibit creativity and get creatives off track
  • How to live with those elements to a creative person’s mind and emotions, how to build physical and emotional resilience
  • Living with a creative person
  • Leading creative people, including what are the best environments to encourage creativity

While the examples in the book apply primarily to musicians, actors or the performing arts, it applies equally to other people who create, writers, songwriters, programmers, artists, and so on.

Just one example of a new concept to me is the notion of “skinlessness”, whether creative people “feel their own pain more intensely and feel others’ pain as well. This is also based on the belief that creative people are not only better able to describe their own emotions, but the feel other’s emotions more intensely.” The book goes into this concept of being a “skin-covered antenna” in more detail, but is summarized quite well by this quote from Pearl Buck:

The truly creative mind in any field is no more than this: A human creature born abnormally, inhumanely sensitive. To them… a touch is a blow, a sound is a noise, a misfortune is a tragedy, a joy is an ecstasy, a friend is a lover, a lover is a god, and failure is death.
Add to this cruelly delicate organism the overpowering necessity to create, create, create — so that without the creating of music or poetry or books or buildings or something of meaning, their very breath is cut off…
They must create, must pour out creation. By some strange, unknown, inward urgency they are not really alive unless they are creating.

I can’t do justice to summarizing what’s in the book: you really have to read it! Whether you are a creative person or you know someone who is, I highly recommend it.

Here’s where to find out more about the book:

I’ll certainly be telling everyone who will listen about the book.

Iterate Iterate Iterate

The article on Iteration. It argues that iteration can be either rotating around a cycle using previously known information, which is a “Knowledge Loop”. That is stable, because is is built on known ideas. The other loop is an “Insight Loop”, where, with each iteration new ideas are pursued, and there can be innovation. We tend to get stuck in one or the other loops, but if we are aware of that, then maybe we can choose to shift to the other loop if that’s the best for te given situation. We can be more innovation by choosing to test new ideas and try new things, rather than jumping to the known solution or the predictable.